Employment Law Weekly

  • Skip to content
  • Jump to main navigation and login

Nav view search

Navigation

  • Home
  • Stay Connected
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Research
  • Employment Law Academy
  • Work Comp Academy
  • LINKS

Search

Article Categories

  • ADEA
  • ADA
  • ADAAA
  • AGE DISCRIMINATION
  • ARBITRATION
  • BACKGROUND CHECKS
  • BENEFITS
  • BFOQ
  • BULLETIN BOARDS
  • CHILD LABOR
  • COBRA
  • CFRA
  • CBAs
  • DFEH
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • DISABILITY
  • DISCIPLINE
  • DOL
  • DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS
  • DRESS CODES
  • DRUGS AND ALCOHOL
  • DLSE
  • EQUAL PAY ACT
  • EAPs
  • ERISA
  • EMPLOYEE HANDBOOKS
  • EEOC
  • EPLI
  • ERGONOMICS
  • ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS
  • EXEMPT vs. NONEXEMPT
  • FEHA
  • FMLA
  • FLSA
  • GENDER DISCRIMINATION
  • GINA
  • HIPAA
  • HEALTHCARE
  • HARASSMENT
  • HOLIDAYS
  • HSA
  • HEALTH BENEFITS
  • HIRING
  • IMMIGRATION STATUS
  • INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS
  • INTERACTIVE PROCESS
  • INVESTIGATIONS
  • JOB DESCRIPTIONS
  • LAYOFFS
  • LEAVES OF ABSENCE
  • MEAL AND REST PERIODS
  • MILITARY LEAVE
  • MINIMUM WAGE
  • MINORS
  • NLRB
  • NOTICES
  • OSHA
  • OVERTIME
  • PAID FAMILY LEAVE
  • PERSONNEL RECORDS
  • POSTING
  • PREGNANCY
  • PRIVACY
  • RACE DISCRIMINATION
  • REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION
  • RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION
  • REFERENCES
  • RETURN-TO-WORK
  • RETALIATION
  • SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
  • SEVERANCE PAY
  • SEXUAL HARASSMENT
  • SEXUAL ORIENTATION
  • SOCIAL MEDIA
  • SOCIAL SECURITY
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • TERMINATION
  • TITLE VII
  • USERRA
  • UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
  • UNIONS
  • VACATIONS
  • WARN
  • WHISTLEBLOWING
  • WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
  • WORKPLACE SAFETY
  • WAGE AND HOUR
  • WRONGFUL TERMINATION
  • Uncategorized
  • All News

Search News

  • Login Form

  • Forgot your password?
  • Forgot your username?
  • Create an account
You are here: Home OVERTIME

“Personal Attendant” May Be Exempt From Overtime

  • Print
  • Email
Article Information
Published on Thursday, 17 May 2012 01:38

When someone hires an employee to care for an elderly or disabled person in his or her home, the employee is usually not entitled to overtime pay depending on the type of work performed by the caretaker. Specifically, if the employee performs work of a "personal attendant," which refers to a person employed to supervise, feed, or dress a person who by reason of age, physical disability or mental deficiency needs supervision, the caretaker is exempt from overtime pay requirements. However, if the caretaker performs a "significant amount of work" (i.e. duties which constitute greater than 20% of the weekly work time) in addition to these tasks, such as housekeeping responsibilities, the caretaker is not exempt from overtime pay. Additionally, with certain exceptions, if the caretaker is a registered nurse employed to engage in the practice of nursing in the home, the nurse is not exempt from overtime pay requirements.  Read More.

DOL Recovers $4.83 Million in Back Wages From Wal-Mart for More Than 4,500 Workers

  • Print
  • Email
Article Information
Published on Tuesday, 01 May 2012 22:22

Wal-Mart Stores Inc., has agreed to pay $4,828,442 in back wages and damages to more than 4,500 employees nationwide following an investigation by the U.S. Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division (DOL) that found violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime provisions. Wal-Mart has also agreed to pay $463,815 in civil money penalties. The alleged violations related to current and former vision center managers and asset protection coordinators at Wal-Mart Discount Stores, Wal-Mart Supercenters, Neighborhood Markets and Sam's Club warehouses. The DOL alleged that Wal-Mart failed to compensate these employees with overtime pay, considering them to be exempt from the FLSA's overtime requirements. However, the DOL’s investigation apparently determined that the employees were nonexempt and consequently Wal-Mart owed them for overtime pay for any hours worked beyond 40 in a week.

According to Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis, "Misclassification of employees as exempt from FLSA coverage is a costly problem with adverse consequences for employees and corporations…Let this be a signal to other companies that when violations are found, the Labor Department will take appropriate action to ensure that workers receive the wages they have earned." The FLSA provides an exemption from both minimum wage and overtime pay requirements for individuals employed in executive, administrative, professional and outside sales positions, as well as certain computer professionals, provided the employees meet certain criteria regarding their job duties and are paid on a salary basis at not less than $455 per week (the federal standard). It is important for employers to recognize that job titles and job descriptions do not determine exempt status. In order for an exemption to apply, an employee's specific job duties and salary must meet all the requirements of the DOL’s regulations. Read More.

Wage and Hour Lawsuits Have Become a Major Concern for Employers

  • Print
  • Email
Article Information
Published on Wednesday, 04 April 2012 05:40

Wage-and-hour lawsuits have become a major concern for employers. As reported by www.workforce.com, “The complexity of federal and state laws, the relative ease of winning class action certification and workers laid off as a result of the weak economy have led to more litigation in recent years, observers say. For example, the Department of Labor said there were 40,000 wage-and-hour complaints during fiscal 2010, up about 15% from the roughly 35,000 complaints in fiscal 2009. Many claims fall into two major categories: misclassification of workers as exempt, and unpaid overtime, observers say. However, employers can minimize the chances of litigation by taking steps that include periodic audits to determine whether employees are being properly classified, as well as careful record-keeping. When employers are sued, experts say settling the case may be the wiser course. Wage-and-hour litigation is the fastest-growing type of class action, legal experts say. ‘If you asked me what was the headache that kept folks up at night five years ago when it comes to workplace-related lawsuits, I'd say employment discrimination lawsuits,’ said Gerald L. Maatman Jr., a partner with law firm Seyfarth Shaw L.L.P. in Chicago. ‘Today, the headache that keeps people awake at night’ is wage-and-hour litigation, he said. ‘If you're interested in saving money and avoiding the courthouse, I think that's the No. 1 issue right now,’ Maatman said. ‘Every year we think we're at the top of the bell curve, but we haven't reached that yet.’" Read More.

DOL Cracks Down On Restaurants in Massachusetts for Overtime Violations

  • Print
  • Email
Article Information
Published on Tuesday, 03 April 2012 15:46

An investigation by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), focusing in on the restaurant industry in Massachusetts, has apparently uncovered substantial violations of the minimum wage, overtime and record-keeping provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). To date, investigations by the Boston District Office of the department's Wage and Hour Division, have found $1,307,808 in back wages due to 478 employees of multiple establishments. In addition, the division now is assessing liquidated damages, payable to employees, when employers are found in violation. According to Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis, “The restaurant industry employs some of our country's lowest paid workers, who are vulnerable to exploitation…In response to the extensive level of noncompliance we discovered, we will expand our efforts to bring the industry into compliance to ensure that employees receive the minimum wage and overtime wages required by law…Our investigations found that several restaurants violated the FLSA by paying employees flat salaries for all hours worked without overtime pay, failing to combine hours worked at multiple locations for overtime purposes, paying incorrect overtime rates to tipped employees, making illegal deductions from employees' wages and failing to keep accurate records of employees' hours." George A. Rioux, the division's district director in Boston, commented that "Even more serious, our investigations found an emerging trend of misclassifying restaurant workers as independent contractors in order to avoid minimum wage, overtime and record-keeping requirements of the FLSA." Read More.

DOL Extends Comment Period on Proposed Rule to Require Minimum Wage and Overtime Protections for In-Home Care Workers

  • Print
  • Email
Article Information
Published on Tuesday, 13 March 2012 17:49

The U.S. Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division has announced a nine-day extension of the comment period for its proposed rule to require minimum wage and overtime protections for workers who provide in-home care services. The division originally published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register on December 27, 2011, with a comment period set to end on February 27, 2012. The division then extended the comment period to March 12. The DOL has now decided to extend the comment period through March 21. Comments received between December 27 and March 21 will be included in the rulemaking record. The extension of time is intended to provide additional time for members of the public to analyze the issues raised in the proposal and to provide comments. The proposed rule expands minimum wage and overtime protections to include all home care workers employed by third parties, such as staffing agencies. It also clarifies that individuals performing skilled in-home care work are entitled to minimum wage and overtime pay. However, individuals engaged by families for “true companionship or fellowship activities,” such as visiting with friends or pursuing hobbies, still would be considered "companions" and thus will not be required to meet the act's labor standards provisions. To learn more about the proposed rule, visit http://www.dol.gov/whd/flsa/companionNPRM.htm.

More Articles...

  1. DOL Extends Comment Period on Proposed Rule to Provide Minimum Wage and Overtime Protections for In-Home Care Workers
  2. Court Rules Commissioned Employees Were Properly Classified As Exempt
  3. NLRB Holds Class Action Waiver in Mandatory Arbitration Agreement Violates the NLRA
  4. DOL Proposes Amendments to Domestic Caregiver Regulations
  5. HR Practice Pointer: What is an Alternative Workweek Schedule?
  6. Proposed Bill Would Amend FLSA to Modify Computer Professional Exemption
  7. Employers Must Be Careful About Employees Performing Pre-Shift Work
  8. Labor Commissioner Files $17 Million Lawsuit Against ZipRealty For Alleged Wage Violations
  9. 9th Circuit Holds Social Workers Did Not Meet Overtime Exemption
  10. Court Rules Law Clerk Not Entitled To Overtime
  11. U.S. Supreme Court Holds California Overtime Laws Apply to Non-Residents
  12. DOL Launches Phone APP For Tracking Hours Worked
  13. DOL Recovers Nearly $2.9 million in Back Wages From Employer
  14. 9th Circuit Upholds Decertification of Class in Overtime Case
  15. DOL Obtains Judgment for $1.76 Million in Overtime Violations
  16. Employers Continue to Face Difficult and Costly Litigation
  17. Class Certification Denied in Wage and Hour Case

Subscribe to RSS Feed

feed-image Subscribe to RSS Feed
  ©Copyright 2011-2012 Employment Law Weekly  A Division of Floyd, Skeren & Kelly, LLP, All rights reserved. DISCLAIMER: The information on this site is for general information only. This information should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship with the authors of any of this information or their employers. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice regarding their individual legal issues.