Employee Terminated Allegedly For Complaining About Coworker Threats
- Article Information
- Published on Tuesday, 03 January 2012 21:03
Grand Central Partnership, Inc. (GCP), a not-for-profit developer of real estate, offices, and facilities around the Grand Central Terminal area in New York, apparently violated a consent decree and committed new illegal acts when it fired a black Rastafarian security officer allegedly in retaliation for his complaints about threats of violence and racism. According to a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), in 2009, EEOC and GCP settled an earlier lawsuit about GCP’s treatment of Rastafarian and Caribbean security officers with a consent decree filed in federal court. Pursuant to that settlement, the parties had agreed that GCP would accommodate the religious practices of the Rastafarian security officers and not retaliate against Rastafarian security officers for their participation in the lawsuit. As part of the settlement, GCP was also subject to supervision by the federal court in that action. The EEOC’s new lawsuit claims that in 2010, the hostility toward Rastafarian employees at GCP resurfaced when a non-Caribbean security officer threatened to shoot and kill a group of Rastafarian officers. After a white security supervisor allegedly made light of the physical threats made to the Rastafarian employees, one of the Rastafarian security officer objected to the supervisor’s conduct. Additionally, he called the supervisor a racist for referring in the past to a group of Rastafarians with the “N word” and for threatening to stand in the way of their receiving wages for their work. After the security officer complained to the supervisor and telephoned EEOC, GCP terminated the employee approximately three months later. Elizabeth Grossman, Regional Attorney of EEOC’s New York District Office, commented that the “EEOC is particularly concerned when it obtains a consent decree to stop violations of the law and the employer turns around and ignores the settlement by reverting to the illegal behavior. We will pursue vigorously retaliation claims against employers whose managers would rather not comply with court orders and fire individuals who object to threats based on their religion and bias based on race.” Read More.
Employers Beware: Cal/OSHA Violation May Result in Felony Charges and Substantial Penalties
- Article Information
- Published on Wednesday, 28 December 2011 19:18
All employers must provide a safe workplace and comply with workplace safety laws. Failure to do so can result in criminal prosecution and substantial monetary penalties. Therefore, to ensure worker safety, comply with the Cal/OSHA law, and avoid serious charges and penalties, employers must display a workplace poster advising employees of their rights and responsibilities under Cal/OSHA; implement a written and effective injury and illness prevention program for employees to follow; understand the particular hazards each employee faces on the job and keep records showing that each employee has been trained in the hazards unique to each job assignment; immediately correct any hazardous condition that the employer knows may result in serious injury to employees; and, notify the nearest Cal/OSHA office of any serious injury or fatality occurring on the job. Further, an employer must never: (1) permit an employee to do work that violates Cal/OSHA law; (2) permit an employee to be exposed to harmful substances without providing adequate protection; and, (3) allow an untrained employee to perform hazardous work. Cal/OSHA violations carry penalties of up to $7,000 for each violation and up to $25,000 for each serious violation. A willful violation that causes death or permanent impairment of the body may result, upon conviction, in a fine of not more than $250,000, or imprisonment up to three years, and if the employer is a corporation the fine may be up to $1.5 million. In a recent case, the Los Angeles County district attorney filed felony charges against the University of California and a UCLA chemistry professor in connection with a laboratory fire that killed a staff research assistant. The incident occurred in December of 2008, when Sheharbano Sangji sustained severe burns when air-sensitive chemicals broke into flames during an experiment and ignited her clothing. Sangji was not wearing a protective lab coat. She died 18 days later. Her death raised questions about UCLA lab-safety practices, as well as the employee training and supervisory practices of professor Patrick Harran, a member of UCLA’s faculty for whom Sangji worked. The district attorney’s office has charged Harran and the regents of the University of California with three counts each of willfully violating occupational health and safety standards, resulting in Sangji’s death. Harran faces up to 4 1/2 years in state prison and UCLA could be fined up to $1.5 million on each count. UCLA issued a statement emphasizing that “UCLA intends to mount a vigorous defense against the outrageous charges announced today by the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office.” Read More.
More Articles...
- Interstate Truck and Bus Drivers Prohibited From Using Hand-Held Cell Phones
- CA Supreme Court Holds Cal-OSHA Requirements Are Delegable To Independent Contractor
- OSHA Launches National Survey on Employers' Safety and Health Practices
- Employer Deadline for 2010 OSHA Recordkeeping Annual Summary is February 1, 2011
- OSHA Issues Largest Fine Ever Against An Employer-$50.6 million Dollars

